Most-used on OpenRouter is a price signal, not proof of capability.在 OpenRouter 上用量第一，是价格信号，不是能力的证明。
As of October 27, DeepSeek routes about 46% of the tokens developers send through OpenRouter, more than OpenAI (~12%) and Google (~5%) combined, and the platform's top two models are both the cheap DeepSeek V4.1 Flash variant. The easy read is that DeepSeek is winning the model race. The ranking says something narrower.
Read the mechanism before the ranking. DeepSeek ships open weights, so dozens of hosts compete to serve it and the per-token price falls toward zero. A developer running high-volume, cost-sensitive work (bulk classification, cheap coding agents, synthetic data) routes to the cheapest model that clears the bar. A usage board measures exactly that: price times availability times how much grunt work a model is trusted with. It does not measure which model is best.
So 'DeepSeek passed OpenAI and Google' mostly means DeepSeek became the default cheap utility rather than the frontier. The more a model tops this board, the more it is being consumed as a low-margin commodity. Part of the lead is real quality; DeepSeek V4 is genuinely strong at code. You cannot read that off the volume.
Picking a model? Don't treat most-used as best. Run your own task, price the total cost, and read the leaderboard as a map of what is cheapest-adequate. We'd revise this if independent capability tests, not usage, showed DeepSeek's flagship leading OpenAI, Google and Anthropic outright over the next quarter.
截至 10 月 27 日，开发者通过 OpenRouter 发送的 token 里，约 46% 流向 DeepSeek，超过 OpenAI（约 12%）和 Google（约 5%）两家之和；平台排名前两位的，都是便宜的 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 版本。顺手的读法是『DeepSeek 正在赢下模型竞赛』。但这个排名说的是更窄的一件事。
先看机制，再看排名。DeepSeek 是开放权重，于是几十家供应商争相托管它，单位 token 价格被压到接近零。一个要跑大批量、对成本敏感的活（批量分类、廉价的编程 agent、合成数据）的开发者，会把任务路由到能过关的最便宜的模型。用量榜衡量的正是这个：价格 × 可得性 × 一个模型被放心交给多少粗活。它衡量的不是哪个模型最强。
所以『DeepSeek 超过了 OpenAI 和 Google』，更多意味着 DeepSeek 成了默认的廉价工具，而不是前沿。一个模型越是霸占这个榜，就越是被当成低毛利的大宗商品在消耗。领先里有一部分是真实的质量：DeepSeek V4 在写代码上确实很强。但你没法从用量里读出这一点。
在挑模型吗？别把用量第一当成最好。用你自己的任务去测，算上总成本，把排行榜当成一张『什么最便宜又够用』的地图。如果在未来一个季度，独立的能力对测（而不是用量）显示 DeepSeek 的旗舰模型全面领先 OpenAI、Google 和 Anthropic，我们会修正这个判断。
Built on the WAKENEX concept:所用的 WAKENEX 概念： Results alone don't prove capability能力不能由结果单独证明
Sources来源
- Source: openrouter.ai/rankings来源：openrouter.ai/rankingsopenrouter.ai ↗
Add WAKENEX as a preferred source on Google在 Google 把 WAKENEX 设为首选来源
READ NEXT接着读
Google's Multi-Party Compute buys stronger key security at one new dependence.谷歌的 Multi-Party Compute 用更强的密钥安全，换来一项新的依赖。
Your coins now move only when Google's cloud agrees to sign. That is the trade worth seeing.
你的币，从此只有在谷歌的云同意签名时才动得了。这就是值得看清的那笔交易。
Open note阅读短评
The Fed's 10-2 hold isn't a verdict that inflation is beaten.美联储 10 比 2 的按兵不动，并不是通胀已被制服的判决。
It's a divided committee buying time. The Committee kept the funds rate at 3.75%-4% while its own statement admits inflation "remains elevated," and two of twelve voters, Lisa Cook and Beth Hammack, pushed to hike another quarter point instead.
它只是一个意见分裂的委员会在拖延时间。委员会把联邦基金利率维持在 3.75% 到 4% 的区间，而它自己的声明却承认通胀『仍然偏高』；十二位票委中有两位——丽莎·库克（Lisa Cook）和贝丝·哈马克（Beth Hammack）——主张应当再加息四分之一个百分点。
Open note阅读短评
Bitcoin ETF flows measured the carry trade, not conviction.比特币 ETF 的资金流量衡量的是套利交易，不是信念。
Galaxy Research read the 13F filings through June: nine firms (Millennium, Brevan Howard, Goldman Sachs, D.E. Shaw among them) cut 68,000 BTC of spot ETF exposure, about $5.4 billion. The easy headline is that Wall Street is fleeing Bitcoin. The filings say something narrower.
Galaxy Research 梳理了截至 6 月的 13F 持仓文件：九家机构（包括 Millennium、Brevan Howard、Goldman Sachs、D.E. Shaw 等）合计减持了 6.8 万枚 BTC 的现货 ETF 敞口，约 54 亿美元。顺手的标题是『华尔街正在逃离比特币』，但文件说的是更窄的一件事。
Open note阅读短评